Equipment Comparison
Detailed side-by-side comparison of rubber specifications and performance
VS
VS
Detailed Comparison
| Specification | Stiga DNA Platinum M | DHS NEO Hurricane 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Stiga | DHS |
| Category | rubber | rubber |
| Subcategory | inverted | inverted |
| Overall Rating | No ratings yet | No ratings yet |
| speed | No ratings | No ratings |
| spin | No ratings | No ratings |
| control | No ratings | No ratings |
| durability | No ratings | No ratings |
| spin | 9.4 | 9.9 |
| year | 2023 | Not specified |
| speed | 9.5 | 8.5 |
| sponge | Professional | Hard |
| control | 8.6 | 8.2 |
| hardness | 52.5 | 40 |
| topsheet | Platinum Series | Tacky |
| users | Not specified | 199 |
Professional Usage
Stiga DNA Platinum M
No professional usage tracked
DHS NEO Hurricane 3
Comparison Summary
• This comparison showcases different manufacturer approaches: Stiga vs DHS.
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Stiga DNA Platinum M if:
- • You prefer Stiga products
- • Your playing style suits inverted characteristics
Choose DHS NEO Hurricane 3 if:
- • You prefer DHS products
- • Your playing style suits inverted characteristics
You Might Also Compare
Explore more rubber comparisons to find your perfect match.
Browse All rubbers