Equipment Comparison
Detailed side-by-side comparison of rubber specifications and performance
VS
VS
Detailed Comparison
| Specification | JUIC Neo Anti | Butterfly Tenergy 05 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | JUIC | Butterfly |
| Category | rubber | rubber |
| Subcategory | anti | inverted |
| Overall Rating | No ratings yet | No ratings yet |
| speed | No ratings | No ratings |
| spin | No ratings | No ratings |
| control | No ratings | No ratings |
| durability | No ratings | No ratings |
| spin | 1 | 9.9 |
| speed | 6 | 9.7 |
| sponge | Neo | Spring Sponge |
| control | 9.3 | 8.3 |
| topsheet | Anti-Spin | High Tension |
| users | Not specified | 428 |
| hardness | Not specified | 36 |
Professional Usage
JUIC Neo Anti
No professional usage tracked
Butterfly Tenergy 05
Comparison Summary
• This comparison showcases different manufacturer approaches: JUIC vs Butterfly.
• These represent different playing styles: anti vs inverted.
Which Should You Choose?
Choose JUIC Neo Anti if:
- • You prefer JUIC products
- • Your playing style suits anti characteristics
Choose Butterfly Tenergy 05 if:
- • You prefer Butterfly products
- • Your playing style suits inverted characteristics
You Might Also Compare
Explore more rubber comparisons to find your perfect match.
Browse All rubbers