Equipment Comparison
Detailed side-by-side comparison of rubber specifications and performance
VS
VS
Detailed Comparison
| Specification | Donic Piranja CD | DHS NEO Hurricane 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Donic | DHS |
| Category | rubber | rubber |
| Subcategory | long_pips | inverted |
| Overall Rating | No ratings yet | No ratings yet |
| speed | No ratings | No ratings |
| spin | No ratings | No ratings |
| control | No ratings | No ratings |
| durability | No ratings | No ratings |
| spin | 9.1 | 9.9 |
| speed | 4.3 | 8.5 |
| sponge | CD Technology | Hard |
| control | 8.8 | 8.2 |
| topsheet | Long Pips | Tacky |
| users | Not specified | 199 |
| hardness | Not specified | 40 |
Professional Usage
Donic Piranja CD
No professional usage tracked
DHS NEO Hurricane 3
Comparison Summary
• This comparison showcases different manufacturer approaches: Donic vs DHS.
• These represent different playing styles: long_pips vs inverted.
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Donic Piranja CD if:
- • You prefer Donic products
- • Your playing style suits long_pips characteristics
Choose DHS NEO Hurricane 3 if:
- • You prefer DHS products
- • Your playing style suits inverted characteristics
You Might Also Compare
Explore more rubber comparisons to find your perfect match.
Browse All rubbers